With reference to Jane Boyer’s comment below.
Essentially I think that the merely tasteful is not Art, but Art objects can be tasteful. Taste objects are class based tribal totems. Art objects can take any form. The distinction between the intellectual and the physical is false in that thinking is making, making is thinking. (when we think ‘about’ something, we are nevertheless making) Intellectualising is inevitable since we ask what things mean. We cannot know what something means without making something else. (responding to it) Creativity fractures taste.
