0 Comments

During my bursary period I am meeting several times with Gill Park, director of Pavilion, a Leeds based commissioning organisation. I have known Pavilion for a while; first as a visitor to their exhibitions, then in 2008 I worked with them as a support artist on a summer education project. I also set up and now volunteer to help to run Leeds Art Walk with them. I have always been interested in what they do but have become especially so over the past 2-3 years as they have moved away from a focus on photography to explore image-making more broadly and to work with artists on commissions which involve significant research and exhibition outcomes in diverse non-gallery settings.

Gill Park became director of Pavilion last year and she is a colleague and a friend who, I expect, would have been happy to meet me any time to talk about my work. But somehow I had never asked her to do this before now. I suppose this is to do with not wanting to take advantage of people’s time and generosity and also perhaps because we always had other more pragmatic or immediate things to talk about. However, just prior to the bursary, I had decided to be brazen and take advantage of some of the people I know. Gill was one of several local artists/curators/professionals who I asked to give me some feedback on my work. She was also without doubt the one who seemed to ‘get it’ most immediately, who made suggestions that resonated with what I would like to achieve. So, when the bursary opportunity came up from a-n and I could seek to meet artists and curators further afield, it also seemed to make sense to ask Gill to be a mentor over this time period.

It is really useful to have someone I can go back to and talk to about conversations and ideas that come up from my one off meetings. Moreover Gill has specifically been helping me to make an application for Grants for the Arts…which I have just recently submitted. Fingers crossed! As I mentioned in my previous post, I am exploring the locations/context/framing of my work; initial conversations with Gill and Elaine Speight (more about that to come in another post), along with my own thinking and prior research, have led me to think that I need a period of time away from site-responsive projects and commissions. I want some research, development and studio time to make some video, print and artist book works that are not based on a particular site. Ideas for these have been vaguely buzzing around in my head for a while but have been shoved to the back of the queue by more time-dependent projects or projects that I prioritise because I am getting paid. I find it quite hard to make work speculatively without knowing there is a definite exhibition outcome. So partially the grant application has involved making a framework to develop new work, including outcomes – but ones I have more ownership over. Also I am trying to develop a way of working that is ultimately more sustainable (even though I hate the word ‘sustainable’ in this context) Can I make artwork that can be re-exhibited or exist in several instances or locations, even if in the long run site may still be important. I am also mindful about what happens beyond this bursary, how can I continue the conversations and self-reflection that the bursary has encouraged?


0 Comments

I have been neglecting this blog a bit whilst busy with various applications and projects, but I have started meeting with people as part of my re:view bursary. In fact I am nearly half way through my meetings. So perhaps I should at least put pixel to screen about who I am meeting and why. Already I have met curator Elaine Speight and artists Emma Smith and Erica Scourti. Next up I will be meeting curator and writer Matthew Hearn and Director of InSite Arts Sarah Collicott. Plus throughout the process Gill Park, Director of Pavilion, is acting as a mentor whereby I will meet with her several times.

I am asking the curators/directors to look at my portfolio and give some feedback on my work. Conversely I am asking the artists to tell me about their work – how they find or create opportunities, how they collaborate with others and how they frame or articulate what they do as artists.

A lot of my artwork over the past couple of years has been site or context responsive and more latterly has also developed with input from participants in a particular locality. Partially this is because I am interested in working in non-gallery public settings and in exploring collaboration with others; partially it has been pragmatic. 3 years ago I made the move from having a regular non-artist job in the arts – which gave me a stable although meagre income – to trying to earn more income from being an artist. Although I have continued with other freelance roles, I have actively been pursuing the possibility of earning money as an artist through residencies and commissions. The projects that have had the biggest budgets are the ones where I respond to a particular place or a particular people, often working with participants from the community.

Now I want to reflect on this period of working, to explore whether site-responsive or collaborative working is becoming intrinsic to what I do or if this is a distraction from my real concerns. Or more likely, it is one strategy amongst several. So I have chosen to meet with curators who work on programmes where site or place is particularly important, to get their perspective on my work. Plus I will talk with artists who work collaboratively or responsively in a research-based way in a variety of settings, but balance this with a profile in terms of gallery exhibitions or projects/residencies with arts organisations.


0 Comments

Hit list

Do you have a list of galleries, organisations, curators, artists and contexts in which or with whom you would like to work? I don’t have a list, but a couple of the people who I have met recently have told me to do this. Sometimes I start making a vague mental one. Sometimes I start putting some notes down on paper. But the next time I look at the list it often seems wrong and I start all over again. The problem is probably that I don’t spend enough time doing the list, I need to make it a proper project. Or the problem is that I don’t have the confidence to do it. I should start with ambition and them temper it with realism. Perhaps I should set myself a deadline…


0 Comments