Great. The proposal for a new work called ‘Collection’ using my walnut collection plate has been accepted for ‘Beta’ at the Kaleidoscope Gallery in Sevenoaks. I said I would explain, so here goes – the plot:
As an artist working with memory and loss I appropriate the impermanent and transient, and by way of collecting, archiving and indexing, re-present it in a final memorialised form.
My constant choice of the museum presentation acknowledges the special relationship between collector, curator and exhibit – a contract of permanent care. So permanency of the final solution is important to me.
In this new work I am stepping outside my usual format to look at the collection as a fluid, rather than a permanent entity.
The collection plate is going to be left at the gallery door with an initial collection of silver and bronze money and ‘pocket items’ – button, safety pin, wrapped sweet etc in it; together with an invitation to donate by swopping with the items in the collection.
Doubtless there will be those that just donate or take.
From the first intervention the initial ‘art work’ collection will no longer exist. With each addition or subtraction a new, temporary ‘collection’ will be formed. There will be no stated resting place for the final collection; no curatable final resolution in any form.
Historically a Collections Plate has been passed around or left at the exit door – traditionally in silence. Donations are made in the belief that the Collection will be used for ‘good works.’ Substituting an item for money in the hope that others will think you have contributed is regarded as a cheek. In passing the plate from hand to hand or leaving it at the door the honesty of the public is plainly an issue, so traditionally the community has achieved this honesty by regarding the taking of donations as a contemptible crime.
I shall be interested to see if the following issues impact on the way visitors choose whether to interact with the work or not:
How willing will visitors be to disregard a gallery taboo and disturb an artwork?
What does it mean in today’s world to disturb or ‘rob’ a donated collection?
In this time of recession and riot does swopping/ taking money have a different resonance?
Does an item such as a sweet have an intrinsic worth – would a visitor feel that to swop it for a hairgrip would be to accept something lesser or more?
Does the fact that there will be no advertised end place for the donated money and items prove problematical for the giver?……..Now I find myself embroiled in trying to find the right table to place the plate on….with only three days left before I go away………hmm………..