A Simple Case of Re-Interpretation? (2/2)
That I tried for almost an hour to become a woman only to miserably fail as soon as my nude body was unveiled. Needless to say that, as the performance was seen as a dance piece right from the start, the choreography was then to blame as was my deliberate choice to go nude towards the end of the show.
I didn’t take these comments gladly. I couldn’t understand them. I couldn’t understand how an audience decided that my quest to be a woman has failed only because I showed the undoubtable sign of the opposite sex. I couldn’t understand how a critic decided I failed in embracing my womanhood because this N factor. I couldn’t understand how a fellow artist decided I didn’t know what Women were really about because Kylie, Madonna or Vanessa Paradis were not “real” women in his eyes. Most importantly I couldn’t understand how everybody failed to recognize that my quest had nothing to do with being, or wanting to be a woman but with wanting my (lost) femininity…In my mind, only question stuck again and agin: How can femininity and womanhood be perceived as being the same? Is it because the former was explored by a man? On that occasion by a male dancer? Is it that easy to think whoever, from the opposite sex, explores his feminine side is trying to be a woman? Is it a genuine general consensus? Or was I facing underneath the same kind of criticism some unexpected stereotypical views on gender(s)?
If I had, at the time, been able to get over the personal & professional anger with the failure of the piece, I’d have enjoyed the guessing game as which gender is the target of this confusion between femininity & womanhood – And perhaps I will play it at some point – but I wasn’t even objective enough to understand why Women In Me collapsed…It took me months to see the wounds here and there until this impulsive moment of realization that the only cause of its failure was me I never gave the piece a chance to be born. I never gave myself a chance to work on it. I was fighting it from the very start and so I refused to recognize its challenge at every level – intellectual, personal, physical. But I also underestimated the strong impact of my opposition to the piece. It wasn’t even a case of denying, I was totally oblivious to the fact I didn’t want to make the piece.
Yes, I was pretty certain my femininity has gone lost and indeed I genuinely wanted to try to reconnect with it. But I didn’t know it was the wrong time. I wasn’t ready to be exposed that way, to show vulnerability, to show my inner struggles, to reveal some uncertainties about my quest, to be judged on my artistic expession and not having any protection, I wasn’t ready to be that person again. All I wanted was to be a man! To feel like a (stereotypical) man! To show off the strength of my physicality, to exhibit my confident masculinity, to show power, control from my body. I wasn’t there (on stage) to make a statement about my body or acceptance. I was there to impose myself, a stereotype-free male dancer, to the audience. And Women In Me, in the process, never recovered from this.
So I played it safe all along, devising a piece to its strict minimum and blaming its difficult process on my internal turmoil. And now I feel like there’s no escape from it. It’s not about making a better piece nor to prove a point (to myself). It’s about filling an artistic void and so taking on the challenge of (re-)defining femininity in A man, through my dancing body, questioning my own understanding of femininity and exposing with confidence my fear of destabilizing my sense of identity.
This is the first step towards the decision to remake the piece. A small but significant step. have yet to let the thought process take the lead & put me in the right direction…Another post of discussion.