Dialogue with Maria Pattison (part 2)
On possibility and failure..
M: So The Art of Possibility is by Benjamin Zander who has ten practices, for those who want to work within the realm of possibility..one was from the position of always having an ‘A”, you are already an A star pupil, all you have to work out is how you got there.
A: Hm, but what happens if you don’t get there? How does failure figure, within these things, I love all that stuff, really…. but when everything crashed around us, I thought, afterwards, I wasn’t so well equipped to deal with massive failure and loss! And allowing for that being all right and part of the journey so I am really interested in how that figures. You are talking about aspirations aren’t you I guess…
M:Yes, I mean I used to have this inner mantra, which was ‘failure is not an option’
A: That’s quite testosterone isn’t it? And lacking in compassion maybe? I have been a lot like that in my life… and now I think the real learning has happened when things didn’t work out in the way I had expected..
M: Yes, I mean I didn’t expect my marriage to not last.
A: Yes..it’s a bit like how we don’t talk about death when we are young, we are not given the option to consider and confront it, which is being addressed now, it’s that shadow side, you know, which has its place. I don’t want it to dominate but it has its place, trying to look at it without too much fear or judgement, I mean the Tibetan Buddhists are mindful of it every day, as just part of life ..
M: And we all have our shadow personalities and we have to accept them otherwise they will get really strong, the more society says or the more we tell ourselves ‘that’s not me, I don’t want that bit’ , the more power we give it. And we have to just know we are flawed, not perfect and that’s ok. That’s what working with these kids (The Pantry) does as well, that you can see that despite some of the behaviours …that they are really lovely. And if we can see that in other people, we can move a bit better towards seeing it in ourselves (…)
A: I think that’s one thing around roles and the value of interdisciplinarity now , is that, if you think about the old definition of artists… it’s like when I send my email I have on my signature, ‘artist, mother human being’, and that’s really significant for me, people have commented on that because actually It’s really important to be…in your human, primarily when you are making, well any kind of work…and breaking down that preconception of how you feel that you- should- be -acting -in this- situation (as an artist) and what people expect you to do. I think I told you that when I did that Liverpool intervention, I didn’t say, I was an artist, I learnt from this one man, who said ‘you’re doing a wonderful public service’, so I the started saying ‘I’m performing a public service for one day only’ and I think people were more receptive. I mean some people enquired further and got what it was, but it wasn’t necessarily helpful to have that label (of artist) and I wasn’t that attached to it either, at that stage in the project.
M: Yes I guess the label of artist can often separate and segregate whereas public servant opens up an interest and an enquiry.