…continued
There is one other here on AN: Susan Francis touches on racism and sexism in her blog (#35 – you need to read it to get the context), then, in the next, how she had googled her name and noted the differences between her namesakes. I couldn’t help but make a connection. One of the great joys of art is that a work stands on its own merits, irrespective of the sex, race, background, physical condition, age, or anything else of the artist. It is once the identity of the artist is revealed that that can be affected by others.
I have no fixed ideas about characterisations in my blog project, but at one point it crossed my mind to make Colin non-white. I had nothing other than the potential of an idea, and I had no thoughts at that stage where I might take it. Sadly, I realised I had already blown the opportunity because I had previously shown white hands. However, what dawned on me whilst reading Susan’s blog is this: without signifiers to the contrary, how many of us, whatever our gender, race or social background, will automatically assume that Colin is white?
I am citing Colin as one example – it’s not just him, of course, but every instance where it isn’t obvious. Is it the case that our view of the world must be relative to ourselves? In other words, if we read Colin’s blog from Beijing, say, we would most likely see Colin as Chinese. However, we live in a socially and ethnically diverse culture, and I think we are the richer for it. If social conditioning were the basis of our assumptions it should, by now, be more inclusive. I hope it is, but is it? I am not suggesting that we are inherently prejudiced; on the contrary, I believe that prejudice is something we are taught.
Really, these things (gender, race, disability, etc.,) shouldn’t matter, (that is to say, in a better world they wouldn’t be an issue) but when we are talking about making false assumptions, these things certainly do matter.
Sort of in a similar vein, from about a year ago I remember noticing that a man had joined an online Women Artists Only group ‘in protest’. He had two arguments: one, that there should not be such non-inclusive groups; two, that as a white, middle-class male he was precluded from so many opportunities that he felt disadvantaged….