I got very frustrated last weekend when I couldn’t attend a seminar at the Arnolfini called The Lost Object: On Gesture and Psychoanalysis http://www.arnolfini.org.uk/whatson/events/details… due to work commitments. However thanks to the genius of the Arnolfini’s marketing department there is now an audio recording of the first part of the afternoon available online which I have been pouring over this morning and am excited to report back on http://www.arnolfini.org.uk/downloads/LostObject71…. I am in the process of pestering the Arnolfini about getting the rest of the presentations online, particularly so that I can hear psychotherapist Professor Jeremy Holmes make his presentation.
The seminar referenced the exhibition Otto Zitko and Louise Bourgeois; Me, Myself and I, which has just closed at the Arnolfini. It focused specifically on the relationship between psychoanalysis and drawing but also explored wider themes of memory and the subconscious.
Tom Trevor director of the Arnolfini spoke first and discussed the curatorial process that fed into the exhibition. He brought up the very interesting fact that he had considered including Antonin Artaud’s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Artaud drawings in the show alongside Zitko and Bourgeois. I have come across Artaud’s drawings before but I did not know that many of them were made in the later stages of his life when he was very ill and having electroconvulsive therapy for what are retrospectively thought to be symptoms of schizophrenia. He’s of particular interest to me for his writings on theatre and is someone to research at more at some point.
Next Ann Coxon Curator at Tate Modern read from her forthcoming book on Louise Bourgeois, making detailed mention of the artists insomnia drawings. As a lifelong insomniac I’ve always identified with this series of Bourgeois work and it’s frenetic style. Coxon specifically drew comparison between these works and the process of meditation, noting that their consistent use of circular patterns and repetitive imagery mirrors a kind of rocking motion and the gentle attempt to lull oneself into sleep. One aspect of Bourgeois life that Coxon particularly foregrounded was her role as a mother. For some reason I had never imagined a woman like Bourgeois having children, but apparently she had three daughters and was famed for saying that a woman can only ever come to understand her own mother when she herself gives birth to children. I guess the cyclical implications of this make sense. A lot of Bourgeois work often portrays issues of nurturing and care, offset against anger and betrayal, which I can see now might express the duality of being both mother and daughter and understanding this difficult relationship from both perspectives.
So I am really hoping that the Arnolfini makes the second half of the seminar available and I can continue to chew over these presentations. From what I have heard so far they didn’t really succeed in getting to the truely meaty psychoanalytical stuff but hopefully this happens later in the afternoon. To be continued…..!
