After my previous post on ecopsychology, I decided it was time to finally get around to watching a film called You Live In Public by Ondi Timoner. On the whole it made me want to do a digital detox (yet here I am blogging about it doh!)
The film documents the life of Josh Harris, who made his fortune during the 90s dot com boom. He used his riches to create projects that predicted the revolutionising impact of the internet on human relationships. In 2001 he and his girlfriend Tanya Corrin turned their home into a lavishly designed webcasting studio where they broadcast their entire existence online via webcam and hosted their own chat room where users could comment on the minutia of their existence. Needless to say the relationship and the experiment broke down after 81 days, when both appeared to be suffering psychological consequences from their unusual existence. Of course the project predicted the format of shows like big brother as well as the rise of surveillance culture.
The portrayal of Josh Harris feels quite indicative of a certain male archetype that we are seeing more and more in the media: lonely man with an abundance of money, technology at his finger tips and no capacity to make real relationships, who lavishes himself with obscure riches and hedonism with little regard for the feelings of others. The dot com boomers seem to be portrayed similarly to how we might understand the portrayal of rich bankers in the current media climate, greedy, hedonistic and detached from reality. I raise this because I am interested in how technology, money and power converge around specific instances of emotional and psychological disturbance.
Its clear from the film that Josh Harris had his own longstanding psychological problems stemming from a lonely childhood spent in front of the TV and its no surprise when his obsession with living publicly manifests itself in a particular kind of madness. Whats more surprising is how quickly participants in his millennium project Quiet http://post.thing.net/node/2800 started to show signs of extreme disturbance after living together for a month in a New York basement that was populated by surveillance cameras. Under constant pressure to perform for the cameras participants became distressed, depressed and startlingly hedonistic. A worrying fact when you consider how rapidly our social and digital environment is evolving to mean that we all live in public to some extent.
