Today I need to take a brief detour to examine the term ‘curate.’ I am writing with reference to the thoughts that I noted here on 15th August about a conventional gallery exhibition and how this may not be the most appropriate or interesting outcome of this blog and project. If I decide not to produce a white cube exhibition containing artworks in space as the end product for ‘Group Therapy’, have I curated an exhibition at all, or have I just organised it? Or is it in fact my artwork? AND does it matter anyway as long as the project manifests something of interest?
Luckily I am an obsessional collector of books and whenever such ponderings overtake me I can usually reach for one volume or another to begin to resolve things. On this occasion I’ve come straight to JJ Charlesworth’s essay Curating Doubt in Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance. This essay tracks the progression of curating from practice based archiving and display of objects in museums and galleries to a discourse based theoretical paradigm that generates its own creative perspectives. Charlesworth says that “curatorship can now be understood as the synthesis of institution context and artistic content- the product of an ‘artist’ rather than a curator.” He goes on to quote the warning that Paul O’Neill made in Art Monthly, on the inherent danger that “we are becoming so self-reflexive that exhibitions often end up as nothing more or less than art exhibitions curated by curators curating curators, curating artists, curating artworks, curating exhibitions.”
Over the past three years I’ve been fortunate to partner with some very unusual individuals who have blurred the boundary between the archetypical roles of artist and curator. In 2008 my work as an assistant to Hannah Hurtzig http://www.mobileacademy-berlin.com/ on Blackmarket for Useful Knowledge and Non-Knowledge No 11 On WASTE: The Disappearance and Comeback of Things & Values certainly involved a process of assembling and framing a collection around a theme, although Hannah herself did not refer to this process as curatorial but as artistic. The project offered visitors the opportunity to book an appointment with an expert from various fields and to sit for a five minute conversation which would relate to the central topic: waste. The process was catalytic of conversation and functioned almost as a 3D library which users could draw on to inhabit new perspectives. I would love to find a way for Group Therapy to provide a similar discursive space, but still wish to include some conventional elements of an exhibition.
Let me also add here that buried within the multiple academic references that permeated Blackmarket No 11, I often wondered about ‘the talking cure’ or psychoanalysis as a reference. Hannah talked occasionally about friends who were taking anti-depressants or her own brief depressive experiences…. I often wished I had pushed her to talk more about this, but I was quite young back then and really quite frightened of the woman…… Have a look at the images and I am sure you will see why the low lit intimacy of these face to face conversations puts me in mind of some kind of therapy.
I have used this blog so far to talk about the work of other artists, to look at some commentaries on mental health in the media, to discuss books that I have read and to retell some of my own experiences. I am not sure if it becomes to ambitious to attempt to include all of the above in the final project, or if I ought just to be content to show artists work and accompany this with an interesting conference. Maybe that it enough for now and maybe anything more gets too close to Charlesworth’s fears around excessive curatorial complication?
