Invigilator is a series of public interventions. It's a collaborative project with Nikki Pugh and Kev Ryan.
The latest piece is INVIGILATOR : DIGBETH – this intervention took place on the 29th of March.
INVIGILATOR : DIGBETH is the 5th in the INVIGILATOR series the others being: INVIGILATOR : NEW FOREST, DERBY, TOKYO, NUNEATON
Half a Brick in a Carrier Bag out of Invigilator : Digbeth was featured in /seconds:
“In our streets it is now almost impossible to vanish. We are now watched it seems from almost every building, every corner and yet somehow we feel less safe. Conneally and Pugh ask us to consider what might happen if we were to ditch the cameras and instead benignly watch over each other, look out for each other when we can, leaving the space for one to physically, culturally, morally vanish if one so chooses.”
http://www.slashseconds.org/issues/003/001/articles/conneallypugh/index.php
There are so many aspects to Invigilator : Digbeth that still need working through, collating, understanding.
Here is a link to 'Surveillance':
http://www.archive.org/details/Surveillance
The day after this was published the UK media was awash with stories of how councils are using anti-terrorist laws to spy on people that allo their dogs to foul the streets, famillies that claim to live in a catchment area of a particular school etc
Another aspect of Invigilator:Digbeth are the 'emotion grids' that participants were asked to fill in when at the work place.
I spent some time last night looking at these and the accompanying emotional words list – a list of emotionally related words that participants could circle that they felt applied to them at the time – as many as they wanted to circle or not.
One group posted a filled in Emotion Grid through the letterbox of the building 'Good For Wood' (which sounds like a good title for a porno movie) and pasted another on the building itself.
Harry Palmer's Emotion Grid fell into the canal and floated off.
Those that I have been able to look at will I'm sure soon tell me something.
Listening to the Invigilator:Digbeth discussion I was struck by oblique and direct references to boredom – the gallery invigilators job being referred to as sometimes boring.
When transposed to an outside space where the invigilator has to stand or sit and simply 'watch over' then the space and the action of simply watching over it sets up an interaction that is boring in such a way that it can transcend boredom if we let it… The space becoming bored of the invigilator throws up new facets new resonances between it and the 'watcher over' the 'invigilator'.
A couple of Invigilator:Digbeth participants said that they found the invigilating very zen like – another not at all – the invigilating passed-by with a contrived doing – a counting of and classification of vehicles passing through the invigilated space. Such actions are invoked by the space itself as it is watched over – after all it was only chance that the space invigilated happened to have cars passing through it – this counting this classifying borne out of the possibility of boredom.
"INVITE BOREDOM" – paul conneally 2008
Nikki and I are now independently considering all that happened and was collected during INVIGILATOR : DIGBETH.
We have a vast amount of material. The audio of the workshop is being listened to over and over again by Nikki who is extracting 'phrases' that might be key. I've got some video from this session where ideas around CCTV and being 'watched over' emerge – artists Harry Palmer and Rob Hewitt who formed 2/3s of one Invigilator team tell how the police stopped them and when told 'we're doing art' – then left them alone…
Gavin Wade didn't INVIGILATE but came to the workshop discussion – that gave another view which was interesting whentaken with those who actually went out on the streets – context – supported/unsupported work – gallery/not gallery – public/not public art…
hmm lots to do lots to think on