As the first week of the exhibition draws to a close, here is the final extract from Jack Welsh’s text for Portfolio NW.
The full text is available to read in the Bluecoat and online shortly. Next week marks the start of guest contributions to the blog:
As an institutional platform, Portfolio NW has sought to transcend its own position and consider the wider implications of such an endeavour. By supporting the work of creatives in the region, including writers, it adopts the rightful stance that critical writing is a creative endeavour in itself. This admission recognises that criticism is analogous with the positions occupied by the artist, the institution or the audience within the cultural ecology. Interestingly the Bluecoat’s support of the relationship between art and writing has been explored through an official writer in residence.[i]
Art and criticism operate in a symbiotic relationship. To support a thriving cultural ecology, it is vital that criticism engages with the process of production and dissemination of artwork. The ease of disseminating or accessing content online has gradually led to a democratic shift in how critical writing is consumed. It is a feasible argument that blogging websites, comment boards and social media constitute critical platforms. When choosing the tools in which to conduct criticism, the critic, regardless of their level of experience and on which platform the text will be disseminated, needs to draw on make informed aesthetic judgements that elucidate, interpret, analyse and/or evaluate creative works.[ii]
Critic JJ Charlesworth considers the theoretical problem of undertaking criticism as ‘how to mediate between concrete and individual experience and the wider discursive and institutional cultures that produce the intersubjective constituencies of art.’ [iii] Critics are, usually, not trained as critics; yet this is not a caveat. The knowledge and skills these writers possess have been honed through their own education and creative endeavours. They are already engaged through curating, academia, managing organisations/artist led spaces, working within an institution or making art themselves.
Yet there is universal acknowledgment that critical writing in the region is not yet fully integrated into this process. Critical writing platforms striving to address this, such as The Double Negative and Corridor8 amongst others, are vital in the development of criticism in the region and beyond. In the same manner that institutions such as the Bluecoat support artists, these platforms can offer editorial support, improve writing standards and, crucially, help pollinate the critical conversation in the region.
To inform and expand on this text, a selection of writers, artists and curators practicing in the North West have been invited to contribute to the Bluecoat’s a-n Artists’ talking blog – a prominent online platform dedicated to supporting arts criticism. Each week throughout the exhibition, a new text will be uploaded to the blog. It is hoped that by inviting different contributors, a wider conversation about art criticism will develop, with the potential to cover themes and topics beyond the scope of this text.
Jack Welsh –
July 2013.
Jack Welsh is an arts administrator, researcher and writer based in Liverpool.
[i] Poet and performer Nathan Jones held the yearlong post in 2009-2010 producing new written work, instigating collaborations and curating an exhibition and event. It is interesting to note that the Bluecoat plan to engage with critical writing through a similar position in the near future.
[ii] Yet it should be noted that there is no definitive methodology for undertaking art criticism. Interpretations of criticism are plentiful. Theories posited include a return to evaluation based criticism (Elkins, 2003; Carroll, 2009).
[iii] JJ Charlesworth, Critique vs Criticism (2011), http://bit.ly/nh5jQw