Yesterday over lunch in the little (half) kitchen beside the studio Mireia said something that set me thinking: you work with layers.

 

As I sat here sewing, as I was driving home last night, as I made dinner, as I washed up after breakfast this morning, and throughout the day I have been thinking about that seemingly simple statement: you work with layers.

 

Layers is not a word that I would have come up myself but it feels so appropriate. Layers are exactly what I work with – sometimes literally but nearly always conceptually. I like the imagery that comes with the word – bethat layers of clothing, geological layers … even the layers of an onion.

 

When I make and talk about my work there is layer after layer. Each one having its distinct and separate character. The physical layers might be sequential, the theoretical ones not necessarily. The talking could easily be as much a stripping away of layers as it could be a building up of them.

 

As I sit here now I am struck by Mireia’s choice of preposition: with. I look up a brief definition of ’with’ – accompanied by. A shiver runs down my spine. This too seems to be so appropriate – the layers, especially those layers of meaning, are things that accompany me. I like the immediacy and proximity of ’with’ … there’s a closeness almsot an intimacy. ’With’ even suggests something collaborative. I have described my practice as a collaboration with materials. There is something both active and open about ’with’.

 

While I am in this vein – the verb: work. It’s activeness, it’s physicalness, it’s everydayness all appeal to me.

 

In its entirety Mireia’s short phrase captures the essence of what I do. It is both specific and open for interpretation. For the moment at least it feels as though it is the sentence that I have been longing for – the simple definitive statement that describes what I do without either complication or reduction.

Thank you Mireia!

 

I work with layers.

 

 


1 Comment

Starting to think about the presentation that I have to make next week for a short course (can two half days really be called a ’course’ at all?). I do not know where to start, this morning while washing up after breakfast my mind flitted between different styles of presentation, different starting points, different focuses … as I said I really do not know where to start.

 

This feels uncomfortably familiar, and I am sure that the intention with the instruction to prepare such a presentation is exactly to wake these feelings in those of us who do not have a clear vision of who we are or what we do.

 

What is the intention with this presentation? Is it to present ourselves to the course leaders and other artists/participants? Or is it an exercise in how to present oneself to a prospective commissioner – the course is about how to apply for public commissions. Am I over thinking things? Should I have one way of presenting myself no matter the audience?

 

I am pretty sure that I am over thinking things – that is what I do. And I would really like to change that. Over think and overload … those two have a symbiotic relationship – one leads to the other in a viscous circle. Maybe it is time to empty out things … by which I mean empty my mind and my work. Empty out all the thoughts and ideas – all those ’learned’ things. If I empty my work then the audience has the opportunity … the invitation … to if not entirely fill it then to at least contribute to the filling of it.

 

Do I have the courage to do ’what feels right’? I think that the overloading has to do with justifying and accounting … explaining … piling things on to and in to artworks that should stand on their own. And if they don’t stand on their own then something is not right with the artwork rather than not being right with the account, or the justification, or the explanation. An artwork should work as art and not as an illustration of ideas.

 

Perhaps in my desperation I overload things in the vain hope that the more things that there are the greater the chance that one of them appeals to someone … trying to be all things to all people. What this seems to result in however are very overloaded works and a fractured self.

 

Despite being quick to reassure other people that things are far more complex than simply being right or wrong I find myself worrying that I will do the wrong kind of presentation. That said I shall re-read the mail about the presentation, and then I shall trust my intuition and make the presentation that I want to make. One that hopefully is not so overloaded that it stifles and suffocates the audience, rather one that excites and intrigues them.

 

Let the crazy out and let the light in!

 

 


0 Comments

It struck me the other day that I currently share a certain characteristic with vampires – I have no reflection.

’That’s silly and a really bad pun’ I told myself almost immediately that the thought crossed my mind. But the idea stayed with me and over the following days it deepened. Life without reflection is sort of soul-less. I rush from one thing to the next without time for reflection and somehow even things that are good and enjoyable quickly diminish and fade to something dull, grey, limp, and lifeless.

Unlike a vampire I can do something about this lack of reflection. And that is exactly what I intend to do!

 


0 Comments

Yesterday I had really interesting conversations with three visitors at the show/live work. Not having had the time to write (nor even reflect!) since coming in the gallery last Wednesday I feel as though I am ’out of order’ – I want to think about what is happening in the gallery but have not yet processed things that happened before that.

The last week or so has been an important reminder of the importance of giving myself time and space between things. This is something that is much lacking in my current schedule, and which certainly was not helped by being completely wiped out by Covid for a few days – and even once I was over the worst of it (a feeling of complete physical and mental exhaustion) I remained tired and unable to focus for another ten days.

I was also reminded that filling my schedule to capacity makes it very difficult to deal to with unexpected additional demands, challenges, and events. Just as I was starting to feel better and able to do more than lie on the sofa watching old films came the news that there had been a series (!) of break-ins at the studios in Uppsala. My studio was broken into over Saturday night and Sunday morning. If I had not been in quarantine because of the positive Covid test result I could have gone over to assess the situation on Sunday afternoon. As it was a colleague let me know that an empty camera bag was lying on the floor. I (correctly) guessed that my rather expensive cordless drill had also been taken. My quarantine period was over on Tuesday which was fortunate as that afternoon I was covering a children’s workshop for an artist friend who was also in Covid quarantine. The workshop was in Uppsala so I planned to go past the studio on the way there. Just as I was setting off I received the message that the studios had been broken in to again on Monday night, and that the police were on their way to carry out another ’technical investigation’. I arrived at the studio to find, and join, a small group of artists in another part of the building where they were waiting for the police to conclude their investigations before being allowed in the studios. The police investigation was not over by the time that I had to leave to do the workshop. Wednesday morning I had a meeting at the gallery which I had to attend, and in the afternoon I had my first workshop with another group. So it was not until Thursday morning that I had time to go the studio and see what state it was in. Fortunately the thieves had not done more than take the camera and drill, there was a little evidence that they had gone through a stack of boxes containing materials but nothing was damaged. I guess I might find that other things were taken.

The break in of course produced reams of messages and emails all of which had to read if not reacted to. There was an online ’house meeting’ – which I have to say seemed somewhat surreal in my post-infection state of tiredness. The studios are in two distinct corridors, the one that was broken in to was the north corridor, for some reason sitting at home in my dressing gown listening to remote animated discussions about ’securing the northern corridor’ evoked images of early polar expeditions and historic military manoeuvres (first World War? Crimean?).

By Friday evening the materials that I wanted to have for Transformer were mostly in place at the gallery. However the week had been so unexpectedly hectic and chaotic that I while I was looking forward to starting the ’live work’ I was very aware that I was not really prepared for it.

To be honest Saturday and Sunday are a bit of a blur. There was so much to think about in practical terms of literally opening the gallery – putting out the signs about social distancing, making tea and coffee (chosen in preference to wine as this was not a ’vernissage’), mopping the uselessly pale floor (again), remembering to check the toilets – that when the first visitors arrived exactly as we opened I had not had time to think about how I was going to present (introduce?) what I was doing.

Looking back now I realise that, even if I had not been tired, I took on way too much. The anxiety that I was feeling all week was not good. Of course a little nervousness is to be expected before a show but what I experienced was very almost overwhelming. I do not think that this is the first time that I am reminding myself that I can not operate at two or three hundred percent capacity. Or rather, if I do then the operations are neither particularly successful nor enjoyable.

The question that I need to seriously and honestly answer is why do I behave like this.

 

There is  a quote attributed to both Mae West and Liberace on the lines of ‘too much of a good thing is wonderful’.  This might be true, however the same might not be said of too much of too many good things!

 


2 Comments

The week has not been at all I had had expected. Yesterday afternoon I received confirmation that I have had Covid since at least Tuesday. I started feeling unwell late on Monday morning – thankfully before heading off to the studio in Uppsala as I had planned. The news means that I have another three days of isolating at home, which conveniently takes me up to Tuesday when I start hands-on work with the children’s art project in Uppsala.

 

To be honest I have quite enjoyed being at home and not feel the pressure to get on with things … not having the energy or focus to get on with things if I am going to be completely honest. I had a couple of online meetings but it was not until yesterday that I was able to think clearly enough to put together and send out information about the show that opens next Saturday. ’Sending out information’ is a pretty accurate description of what I did – the neutrality, mundaneness, and monotone quality of that phrase captures the mood of letting people know that something is happening without actively inviting them to come along. Ambivalence is perhaps an appropriate word that goes some way to describe how I feel about the show – a show which is very very far from how I imagined it being whether I am referring to when it was first mentioned back in autumn 2018, or even as recently as December when I was planning a programme of workshops and events. It is not surprising that the show has gone through, in my head in any case, many iterations over the three years. Perhaps naively I was not expecting to have to make such last minute changes that the current pandemic situation and the return to previous Covid routines require. On Monday evening the Artists’ Club committee, of which I am a member, took the decision to halt activities other than opening the galleries (with severely restrictions on visitors numbers at any one time) and allowing the studio to be used for the children’s Saturday workshops (again with certain restrictions and following government guidelines for such programmes). This decision will be reviewed in a month which is exactly when my show closes.

 

 

Speaking with my artist friend K in the week we discussed how presenting live work to a great extent negates the requirement for a separate and distinct programme of events. Visitors are welcome to pull up a chair and chat with me while I am working (at a distance of course), there will be materials available if someone wants to make something themselves, and many of the references and inspirations for the work will be present. The atmosphere of the live work should encourage discussion between visitors as well as with me, and if it is possible to arrange a somewhat spontaneous event, be that a workshop or ’fika’, in February then I can always do that.

 

One thing that is clear to me is that I am not particularly keen on doing anything digital or online. What I am not so clear about is my motivation for this. It could well be that it is just too much to think about at the moment. It could equally be that it something digital might develop over the course of the work. One of the nice things about this live work is that the piece can, and will, evolve over the period. The structure for the work is both very flexible and very accommodating. The list of potential components continues to grow and despite my earlier reflection about feeling ambivalent, I am genuinely intrigued to see what happens over the twenty-three days. Is it possible to be generally ambivalent and specifically intrigued simultaneously?

 

Transformer: live work
22 January to 13 February
Galleri 1 Uppsala Artists’ Club, Uppsala Sweden
www.uppsalakonstnarsklubb.se

Wednesday to Friday 2 – 6pm
Saturday and Sunday 12noon – 4pm

Please note limited visitor numbers in the gallery at any one time, please be prepared to wait for admittance.

 

 


1 Comment