0 Comments

Currently Reading: Harriet Hawkins – Visions of Excess: Michael Landy’s Break Down and the work of Georges Bataille. Published in Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, October 2010

Hawkins talks about Landy’s work Break Down as “unbuildings” and compares to Bataille’s writings, particularly Visions of Excess in which, “excess […] is both necessary and importantly generative.” “For Bataille,” Hawkins explains, “excess is anything that is unproductive in a capitalist means-end economy.” p.20

“Excess is cursed by a production-orientated society because it will never be productive. It sits alongside waste, the formless (l’imforme) and base materialism – “a materialism that implied no ontology” – Bataille, Visions of Excess, p.50-51).” p.20

“Bataille’s heterodoxical operations of formlessness, excess and base materialism are, like the projects of deconstruction they at times seem to herald, performative.” p.20

Exemplifying Bataille’s notion of waste and drawing analogy to Landy’s unbuildings, Hawkins cites Bataille interrupting his object writings with; “Now I place a large glass of alcohol on my table.” and quantifies; “ As a wasteful expenditure of time this unproductive but hugely enjoyable interlude is the radical and destructive negative of the productivity previously found in the objects. […] This “waste” can be understood as unbuildings; acts which are at once destructive and also generative.” p.21

Applying Bataille’s philosophy to Break Down, Hawkins notes the following:

“In a Bataillean movement Landy’s embrace of what is usually “rejected of shunted beneath” – rubbish, waste – becomes understood as means through which to constitute an understanding of oneself and one’s relation to objects.” p.21

“Rubbish here disorders, and in so doing points to the understandings and orderings of objects, commodities, subjects and objects as an ongoing, uncertain process rather than the things themselves.” p.22

“Landy’s remains, shredded plastic, metal and paper arrayed in plastic bins, reflect Bataille’s description of the formless, they “resemble nothing especially not that which they ought” (Visions of Excess).” p.25

Finally, two especially poignant quotes:

“(The) assertion of object birth and object death being something that, as has often been noted in other contexts, is often kept separable from commodity form.” p.26

Citing Rom Harré, “Nothing happens or exists in this social world unless it is framed by human performative activity.” p.29


0 Comments

Culture Now: Michael Landy

Published on YouTube on 27 Jul 2012 by ICALondon

Michael Landy in conversation with ICA director Gregor Muir on Scrapheap Services (1995) having to shred 2000 misprinted crates, cataloguing the entirety of his world belongings which lead to Break Down (2001): destroying the entirety of his worldly belongings that included valeting his car to be destroyed and Gary Humes asking for a painting he gave him for his birthday back. Also his bin watercolours and his painted bronze Self-Portrait as Rubbish Bin (2012) made in China for the Royal Academy 2012 Summer Exhibition that he’s precious about people throwing rubbish into.

Scrapheap Services (1995) http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/landy-scraphea…

Break Down (2001) http://www.artangel.org.uk/projects/2001/break_dow…

Self-Portrait as Rubbish Bin (2011) watercolour http://www.contemporaryartsociety.org/media/uploads/2011…

Self-Portrait As Rubbish Bin (2012) paint and bronze http://gb.fotolibra.com/dave/2012RA01.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6vGY557TI4


0 Comments

Henry Lefebvre – Clearing Ground (1961) published in Documents of Contemporary Art: The Everday. Edited by Stephen Johnstne. Whitechapel and The MIT Press, 2008

“A social group is characterized just as much by what it rejects as by what it consumes and assimilates. The more economically developed a country is, the more gets thrown away, and the faster it gets thrown away. People are wasteful. In New York, in the promised land of free enterprise, the dustbins are enormous, and the more visible they are the more inefficient public services operate. In underdeveloped countries, nothing is thrown away. The smallest pieces of paper or string, the smallest tin is of use, and even excrement is gathered. What we are outlining here is a sociology of the dustbin.”

And J J Charlesworth on Tino Seghal’s apparent dislike of things and conceptual art being a reaction against the ‘overproduction’ of things: “What’s creepy about this second wave of thing-hating is that it’s happening in the midst of a neverending economic recession, which, by definition, is the socially corrosive breakdown in the production of things.

At What Point Does Nothing Become Too Much of a Good Thing? Art Review p.52, September 2012 http://www.artreviewdigital.com


0 Comments

Huge consumption bibliography resource discovered from the project Cultures of Consumption

Consumption Bibliography www.consume.bbk.ac.uk/news/progdocs/consumption%20biblio.doc

“Cultures of Consumption was a 5 year, £5 million research programme that studied consumption in a global context. It ran from 2002 to 2007.

Research ranged from the consumption of public services in Britain to the consumption of drugs in East Africa, from the fashionable West End of London to the commodification of water and cosmopolitan citizenship

The research programme was jointly funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and Arts and Humanities Research Council, and brought together leading researchers from the social sciences and the arts and humanities.”

www.consume.bbk.ac.uk


0 Comments

Current Reading: Commentary by Michael Crang – Negative images of consumption: cast offs and casts of self and society (2012) Environment and Planning A, volume 44, pages 763 – 767

“There has been a recent spate of artistic work focusing on (over)consumption using the lens of disposal and discard. In this brief commentary I will try to sketch out a few common themes across some of this work, showing how it connects with and challenges social science work on consumption and which registers it uses for thinking about the waste our societies create.”

Crang forms a critical framework of influence with reference to Michel de Certeau’s consuming as appropriation (The Practice of Everyday Life, 1984), Georges Bataille’s sense of destructive excess and Robert Smithson argument that separate ‘things’, ‘forms’, ‘objects’, shapes’ were mere convenient fictions (The Collected Writings, 1996, page 112).

He further draws upon Jennifer Gonzalez (Prosthetic Territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies, 1995, pp.133-150) on autotopography: how our possessions form a terrain through which we express, enact, and sustain our selves and mnemotechology [of or relating to or involved the practice of aiding the memory] and Louise Crewe (Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29, 2011, pp.27-46); “The cataloguing of possessions as a performance of self has recently been tracked through different artistic registers that explore how even ridding ourselves of objects leaves their traces.”

David Trotter is also cited on describing how meaning and value is lost through the household clearance in a double reduction from cherished possession to commodity; from commodity to matter, or stuff. (Critical Quarterly 52, 2009, pp.17-28) Firstly, “the first reduction deprives objects of their past, of that surplus of meaning and value they have acquired since their purchase: of everything but their exchange value in the here and now,” and secondly, “enforced by the ruthless skepticism of the bargain-hunters who thumb curtains, prod mattresses, and clap wardrobe drawers to and fro, [and] deprive the objects awaiting disposal not only of their past, but of their future as well. It demonstrates that these still radiant commodities have, beyond a certain point, no future at all. The reduction from commodity to waste-matter which household clearance distinctively fosters is not just the assault of one system of value and meaning on another. It is an assault on the very possibility of systems of value and meaning.”

Crang compares Michael Landy’s Break Down (2001) and Hans Schabus’ Remains of the Day (2011). Michael Landy’s Break Down catalogued and classified all his possessions into 7227 items which he then sent through a granulator to render into them into their constituent materials which were then shipped to a landfill. For Remains of the Day Hans Schabus filled two gallery rooms with neatly categorised and sorted rubbish he and his family threw out over the course of a calendar year. The gallery space sanitises the objects.

Michael Landy – Break Down (2001) video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hYUnkW4sNA

Hans Schabus – Remains of the Day (2011) at Collective Gallery, Edinburgh http://www.collectivegallery.net/past.html

Crang also comments on Wang Jiulang’s video Beijing Besieged by Waste (2008-2010) and compares two works by Chris Jordan; his ongoing Midway: Message from the Gyre (2009-current) examining the Great Pacific Garbage Patch through recording the plastic-riddled stomach contents of hundreds of dead albatross chicks and his contrasting previous project previous Running the Numbers: An American Self Portrait (2006-current) photoshopping objects of consumption and multiplying them into immense scales to visualise the aggregate materiality of consumerism.

Wang Jiulang – Beijing Besieged by Waste (2008-2010) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/gallery/2010/mar/26/beijing-rubbish-wang-jiuliang-photography

Chris Jordan – Midway: Message from the Gyre (2009-current) http://www.chrisjordan.com/gallery/midway

Chris Jordan – Running the Numbers: An American Self Portrait (2006-current) http://www.chrisjordan.com/gallery/rtn/#car-keys

Crang’s commentary is a short and theoretically underpinned snapshot into a couple of current practices of artists dealing directly with their own immediate waste and the mass waste of society at large. A narrative of citations is woven together illustrating the proposition of waste as the “negative casts” of life.

http://www.envplan.com/epa/editorials/a44682.pdf


2 Comments