‘Sevenoaks Kaleidoscope Gallery’ – The first Year

 

Examining Louisa’s work.

Engine ChatChat EngineChatChat is a facilitated peer crit where artists can share ideas, ask questions and get feedback from a small group of peers. An informal atmosphere and constructive conversation is encouraged. This is a dedicated space to think about and share your practice. You can present or join in the discussion.

Elizabeth Murton chairs the group. Each artist in turn presents work and invites discussion with the wider panel, (in our case it was a further five artists) through a question or statement in relation to the work displayed.The latest crit was held on Thursday at Kaleidoscope and featured three artists, Louisa Crispin, Louisa Crispin Richard Heys, Richard Heys, and Sabrina Shah Sabrina Shah. Sabrina Shah was concerned that her work was in need of a theme, Richard asked if the work he presented constituted a ‘body of work’ for an exhibition. Louisa was engaged with a compositional problem in a drawing. Her source of difficulty was a central passage in a composition of wasps, which was dominating the work and curtailing progress.

Louisa Crispin composition sheets.

Last year when some wasps decided to live in her loft, her attention turned from the bees and bee drawings that form a key body of her work, to a creature that she considers is in need of some rehabilitation. Her question concerned ways to solve a composition/content /structural problem. She showed some photocopies with wasps arranged in possible configurations of degrees of order and disorder. Should this particular passage be here or there, what effect will the removal of a particular compositional element have on the whole? The nub of the problem was located in a group of rectilinear shapes on which just one wasp was placed in a corner
The rectilinear element in the composition was problematic because its abstract form was a kind of intrusion and differed in nature to the figurative images of wasps – it had the feel of something from another work, another starting point, a diversion. But was it a problem to be solved or a problem to be discarded? It was noted that the compositon was strongly based upon pattern/ arrangement, so that one point of entry would be to play with pattern in itself, leave out the wasps until structural experimentation provided a formal structure for the figurative content. Richard Heys work ‘We Stand Behind The Sky’ measures 1000mm x 1400mm, a work of intensely coloured atmospheres and one of aseries to be shown

 

‘We Stand Behind the Sky ‘ Richad Heys.

Richard’s colour work is built up in layers of acrylic paint. The process of curation it seemed would provide the making of a body of work; that the work could stand as a body was dependent upon certain works not standing next to each other. In her introduction to the evening, Elizabeth Murton referred to the notion of ‘thinking’. In an indirect way, the whole evening revolved around notions of how we think and what kinds of thinking can we use. There is a distinction to be made between thinking, and thinking ‘about’. We slip easily from one to the other ………….There is a common feeling that thinking is something done by the brain, with words, about something else, that something is done and then thought about, and is done as a result of thinking about it, that decisions are made through a process of cause and effect. All of these notions contain truth, but can also obscure the truth that doing is thinking, feeling is thinking, making is thinking. Louisa’s problem will be solved by finding ways to move things about, change relationships, make physical connections, and similarly Richard’s curatorial problem will be solved by the moving of things.

‘The Owl and the Pussycat’  Sabrina Shah

For me, suggestion of narrative seems embedded in Sabrina’s work; theme arises from her work and the manner of its making. That would not go away if a thematic approach was adopted; the theme is what the work ‘thinks about’.  A self-consciously naive style purposely chosen carries the ironic risk that it might appear selfconscious. At one point Sabrina offered, if I understood correctly, a thought about mistakes keeping the work grounded in reality. The matter of theme is simultaneously central and peripheral. Similar to ‘thinking’ and ‘thinking about’ there is a conjunction of needs, of the work and of the artist. A symbiosis exists between ‘What does the work need?’, and ‘ What are my needs from the work?’, where what happens, happens, and is worked out close to the surface. Ros Barker observed that she could spend considerable time making different readings of Sabrina’s work. Resolution occurs when the thing ‘works’, when both needs are satisfied.

Eleven students of Art from West Kent college FdAD display  final work from year two of their course. A broad range of  ideas and themes are embodied by materials and techniques. From Louise Draper’s Trade(2017) ‘celebrating the geek-art subculture, to Nathan Selvedran’s ‘Hide-Folded(2017) in which collapsing folds of wallpaper and building plaster engage with notions of isolation and anxiety.
Ally Sweidan creates shadows from the patterns on maps of places where he/she has lived. Drawn in lines marked into the surface of a perspex sheet , soft shadows cast upon a paper surface come and go like memories,with the light.
Siana Kohler paints. Her piece which she describes as ‘portraits of a room’ invoke feelings of a charged space redolent of past events. Almost monochromatic, the paint has a softness of touch, an oiliness, something Morandi-esque about them.
Ali Doherty paints also. Black – night- space- white-grey illuminated trees, hand-like foms, images seemingly both isolated and cinematic.

‘Mesmerising Mayhem’ Detail, Maryanne Bakker

Large shiny bulldog clips have a trendy feel. Six of them hold Maryanne Bakker’s large digital print based on a smaller watercolour piece, suggestive of a playful Rorschach blot, digitally repeated and seamlessly stitched together. They lend a temporary feel, a short stay on the wall in the course of a busy itinerary.
Presentation can be problematic. Alanna Coppard fixes her work to the wall with brass panel pins that would glint in a Magpie’s eye. Eighty-eight of them make their point, make the work stand up for itself. Brass panel pins are lovely things. Her drawing seeks a kind of evocative metamorphosis through changes in scale and anthropomorphic form.
James Abbott’s work which ‘…. is heavily influenced by renaissance studies of plants and anatomy….’ is presented in an unmounted paper form hanging by clips.  Renaissance and paper clip engage in a stand-off with the work.

‘Hide – Folded’ Nathan Selvendran

Nathan Selvedran’s sculptural piece in two parts ‘Hide – Folded’ has a feeling of stillness, a kind of finality, settlement, a moment held in suspense. There is completeness that arises from  the materials and the manner of their making, from  fold upon fold of wallpaper material and building plaster, muted brown,  resting in a state of suspended collapse. Michael Ashby offers the thought that his ‘Shaman Box ‘, a piece with maybe a nod to Robert Rauschenberg’s Combines,’…explores how electrical signals from early computer graphics and dance music transmute through synapses inside human brain circuits, forming memories, and new aesthetics from undefinable locations…..’ ( Exhibition notes) Incorporating video and dance music it has the beginnings of an enquiry into the way that tastes are formed, over the airwaves, that we are created by what we recieve from sources to a degree unknown, a cultural thing. Daniel Huckfield uses found objects in ‘Stud’ and ‘Untitled’. To ‘Un-title’ a thing is to strip it of its former identity, make it nameless, leave it to find a new name?

‘Untitled’ Dan Huckfield

Defunct fluorescent light fittings lean exhausted against the gallery wall. Their now impotent wiring hangs loose. There is something mischievous and subversive in painting the one surface that was hidden when the units were screwed to a ceiling.
‘Stud’, a set of three found metal panels from some modular construction, spreads itself on the floor a few metres away. Daniel’s intention is that the pieces ‘….create a dialogue between each other, the flatness and lack of paint of the floor piece against the boldness and energy created by the painted surface of the standing piece’ (Exhibition notes.

‘Broken’ Debbie Clark

Debbie Clark’s piece ‘Broken’ nods in the direction of recent work by Josiah McElheny  ( shown recently at White Cube). A broken wineglass sits in a reflecting chamber, sharp shards hang above it. The LED brightness, the plum and violet richness, the sharp edges, the matter of fact reflective repetition of it all  harbours a decadent, tasteful violence.

‘Trade’ Louise Draper

Louise Draper’s piece ‘Trade’ is a series of 26 small framed portraits and 5 empty frames. she describes it as a ‘collaborative project celebrating the geek-art subculture as commentary on the commercial world.’ (Exhibition notes) Each portrait is named as by a different artist. She describes the work on her Facebook page as sketch cards she has swapped with her fellow Topps artists and the piece is a ‘show within a show’. (Small world, in the course of researching this piece, I discovered Topps produced a card of a baseballing relation of mine, one Greg Minton)

A show of student work reflects upon the degree to which the growth of implicit and explicit criteria might have enabled the artists to progress. A show like this is necessarily uneven. Ideas and execution might not mesh, drawing techniques may not have achieved sufficient fluency, the implications of display for the work might not be fully grasped, statements may seem at times to attempt to remedy difficulties met in the work, but simultaneously, fluency is actively sought, technical competency proceeds little by little, form and content are nudged into closer union, ideas refined; the implications of actions make themselves visible. Art generates its own criteria. Essentially it is not measurable absolutely against some external criteria. Makes you think.