0 Comments

At the start of the month I went to visit a very old, very dear friend in another city. He’s a little younger than I, just about to graduate from art school and step out into the world for the first time. We sat in his studio space for a while; there was a real sense of excitement as everybody made the final push towards their degree show – but this was mixed with a palpable feeling of trepidation; the knowledge that soon you’ll have to jump out of the nest and fly as well as you can.

We talked a bit about what might happen next, about what he’d do after graduating. He’s putting a few proposals together for some summer shows aimed at showcasing new graduate talent – and after that, he said, he hopes eventually to get gallery representation. At that point I said something like, “It’s one way of doing it, but it’s not the only way, and it’s not for everyone…”, only for my friend to reply, “It’s the only way if you want to make a living out of your work and reach as many people as possible… especially in the current climate.”

I found that interesting, as to me, commercial galleries are not synonymous with reaching as wide an audience as you can; in fact, I tend to view them as quite a negative thing, contributing to the level of speculation and commodification within the arts, and, to a certain extent, encouraging stagnation. I’m yet to hear of a commercial gallery that supports artists whose practices do not produce solid, saleable outcomes – for good reason, of course, as commercial galleries are, more than any other type of institution, businesses first and foremost, existing to generate sales and profit. (From my perspective, it’s hard not to read all of the above as being damaging and negative, though I can also understand how a less politically-minded artist with, say, a pure painting practice who has found a supportive, understanding dealer might choose representation. And, of course, more experimental commercial spaces may well exist – any examples are welcomed!)

I talked to my friend about other methods, citing examples of artists I know who manage to make something close to a living from a mix of residencies, exhibition fees and educational work, with studio practice, unpaid-but-fun exhibitions and occasional sales thrown into the mix too. I think it’s a model that’s becoming increasingly viable, with artists utilising social media as a tool for building supportive networks, displaying work and reaching audiences. I tried to explain a little bit about how I feel that gallerists, dealers and art fairs are mostly bad for art and artists, and that it might be more interesting (and fun!) for artists to find another way of promoting, exhibiting and selling.

I’m not sure any of it worked; my friend seemed convinced that gallery representation was and is the only way for an artist – any artist! – to progress and succeed. As such, he’s coming out of art school with vast confidence in his own work (and rightly so; his work is fascinating) but with what looks to me a lot like fear and confusion about the next step. It’s a shame, and I wonder if universities could do more to prepare graduating students for life after art school.


0 Comments

Oh dear! Again, such a long time between posts. I’ve been busy since the New Year with a number of things, two of them significant:

– Developing, proposing and planning my first-ever community-engagement project as “lead artist”. It’s an idea that combines my love of print culture with ideas around social sculpture & intangible outcomes (the focus on the process, with the product recast as ephemera or evidence), hopefully in an accessible and non-rarefied and fun sort of way. I’m so excited to get started – and it’s paid, too, which is lovely. I’m sure I’ll post more about it once it gets started, so watch this space.

– Deciding to apply to various art schools to actually get my BA. I realised that my confidence was lacking, that I felt unable to compete in a professionalised “arts market” (yuck!), and that the only plausible antidote to this was, as my brother would put it, to man up and go back to artschool. The process of applying, compiling work and being interviewed has been a learning experience in itself – criticism being something that most peer-to-peer discourse seems to lack (understandably, for fear of offending). I can reveal that I am now in the peculiar position of being a “working artist” with works held in collections etc. etc. who has also been rejected by Central St Martin’s for BA(Hons) Fine Art! (Though I’ve had no feedback, at interview they seemed to think I didn’t need the course, which is a little frustrating as I think that everybody has something to learn. Perhaps even them, as when I mentioned Allan Kaprow the interviewer said, “oh, pfff, happenings and all that,” and when I mentioned artists’ books he said, “desktop publishing” – perhaps not the school for me!) This rejection has knocked my confidence still further, so much so that I am beginning to re-evaluate my choice to try and pursue a career in the arts. Is it really for me? I’m less and less sure that what I do is strictly art in the way that the World At Large would interpret the word (though it certainly feels like art to me!), or particularly saleable, or indeed something that’s especially easy for others to understand or “get”. I have a couple more interviews to attend, but I’ve started to formulate a Plan B which would take me down a wildly different, far more academic route – though of course I plan to continue in my art and thought practice whatever happens. This would be quite an interesting acid test for all my theorising around the intersection/blurring of art with daily life. As well, I am wondering if the broadening of influence and knowledge resulting from intensive study in another field might not be beneficial to my practice. I don’t want to become one of those artists whose work only addresses other artists. (I treasure those moments at book fairs when a “civilian” picks up & falls in love with one of my bookworks – such a sparking sort of joy!) It’s telling, to me, that the two BA arts courses about which I’m most excited are the most interdisciplinary; though I’m by no means certain that I will be offered a place on either. I know that my art has more to do with philosophy than it does with painting, and I am happy with that. I just wonder if it fits into the artschool definition of what art should be – of what it means to be an artist.

Interesting times.


6 Comments