BOB AND ROBERTA SMITH
Bob and Roberta Smith specialize in witty slogans in his work. He uses paint as his main medium to produce his work in the form of signs. His relation to mine is the fact he uses a lot of text to get his messages and ideas across to the public. His messages are mostly humorous about Art, politics ect to support a lot of campaigns. Maybe the element of humor he has developed in his work is a key part and an element he uses on purpose for the viewer to connect with the work?
I really like his work I find it very satisfying and in a sense it is very likable as it is easy on the eye but thought provoking. These are elements my work has but then there is nothing else. How do I give my work that boost? By Bob and Roberta Smith having individual pieces, I feel it makes his work valuable. His work has the same constant theme. It is the Art.
It has just struck me that maybe I need to make my work more valuable. Make it a piece of Art rather then an installation Art. This would give my work a sense of value. But… on the other hand by not having a physical piece of Art it backs my hole idea and concept of What is Art? If I make a physical piece of Art I am stating as an Artist that I think this is Art. By having the idea of my walls covered in text, technically it does not exist until the viewer decides themselves the realty of the work, making the Art what they believe is Art?
How do I get my viewer to understand this? Rather then seeing it as it is?
Am I Making sense?
What I have just written specks for it self? Maybe I need to have this as a statement. How do I make what I am saying into a metaphor that the viewer is going to understand?
“If I make a physical piece of Art I am stating as an Artist that I think this is Art. By having the idea of my walls covered in text, technically it does not exist until the viewer decides themselves the realty of the work, making the Art what they believe is Art?”