Meaty qualitative report that examines how Tate puts exhibitions together and evaluates the various ways specific exhibitions give experiential and educational “value” to Tate audiences. Taking 2014’s Late Turner and Malevich shows as case studies, it also looks at the contribution of external creative businesses (usually engaged with exhibition design) to the exhibitions. Very interesting, not least for its criticism of interpretation labels. Overall suggests that Tate could initiate richer dialogues with its audiences.
- Contributor:
- Mariza Dima
- Publisher:
- Tate Papers
- Date:
- 1 March 2016
